Britology Watch: Deconstructing \’British Values\’

25 August 2009

No England victory parade, as an ashen-faced Brown is forced to say ‘England’ three times

Hard to say which is the greater victory: England beating the Aussies to regain the Ashes or the fact that this victory forced Gorden the Ashen One to at least write – if not speak – the word ‘England’ no fewer than three times! In a report on yesterday’s somewhat more subdued celebrations of England’s triumph at No. 10 than in the days of Tony Blair’s premiership, the Guardian quoted from a letter Brown had written to the England captain Andrew Strauss. It’s worth repeating in full here for its sheer rarity value:

“I wanted to write to congratulate you and the entire England squad on regaining the Ashes. The series has been yet another wonderful showcase for cricket and for all that is great about sport. It has provided high sporting drama throughout the summer that has yet again gripped the entire nation, and to win the Ashes with your magnificent display at the Oval – and coming back from the defeat at Headingley in the fourth test – shows great determination and commitment.

“There have been many outstanding performances this summer on both sides, but throughout the series you have led England from the front, with patience, resolution and courage. The country is extremely proud of what you have achieved this summer. I would like to invite the England squad in to Downing Street for a reception to celebrate your victory [my emphases].”

Yes, your eyes do not deceive you: Brown said England three times! Note, however, that despite the fact that the Ashes win wrung these words out of him, Brown couldn’t resist making mendacious mention of ‘the entire nation’ being gripped by the series (which nation, you liar? Britain or England? Say ‘English nation’ when you mean it!) and invoking the pride of ‘the country’: again, England or Britain? And also note the telling reference to ‘your victory’ at the end: not ‘our victory’, which would evoke true emotional engagement and national identification.

Well, if the whole ‘country’ of Britain is so proud of the English players, you wouldn’t mind them having a victory parade through the English and British capital city, would you – just as, last year, there was no apparent incongruity in your mind in allowing only a victory parade for the whole British Olympic team – not the English medallists only – for the English people to express their pride in ‘their’ athletes? Oh yes, how silly of me: it’s OK for the English to take pride in British achievements, but your talk of the whole of Britain taking pride in English successes is mere rhetoric. So much for your uttering the dreaded ‘E’ word: it’s all just empty talk.

Actually, I’m not really that upset about there not being a victory parade for the England cricket team like the one in 2005; nor that very few if any of the team members will be recommended for inclusion in the New Year’s Honours list, like the flurry of honours that were granted to the whole team last time we won the coveted relics. All of that was a bit OTT and something of a carrot to the English people: like the ancient Roman practice of organising games to appease the people and make them forget they don’t have any real power over their lives. But if it had been a British cricket team, then what a different story it would have been!

Anyway, just as he’s not really an England man, Brown isn’t a cricket man, either; and after his six-week break, he’s far too busy and got far too many important concerns to attend to than the celebration of a national (English) triumph.

On top of which, I’m not sure that, as a true Scot, his sympathies weren’t really with the Aussies. But he’s got plenty of opportunity to pay England back (not monetarily, you understand) through his political actions. England may have got back the Ashes of English cricket; but Brown will make sure she doesn’t rise from the ashes of her abolished nationhood. Now that’s a British victory Brown would drink a dram to, I feel sure.

Advertisements

15 Comments »

  1. Most disappointed he didn’t refer to the Wales and England cricket team.

    Comment by Hendre — 25 August 2009 @ 10.32 am | Reply

    • How insensitive of him! I guess you’re gutted over there, aren’t you?

      Comment by David — 25 August 2009 @ 12.15 pm | Reply

  2. Here is the final version of the letter after it was put through the Broon McLabour spellchecker.

    Comment by TWTD — 25 August 2009 @ 12.27 pm | Reply

    • I like it!

      Comment by David — 25 August 2009 @ 2.29 pm | Reply

  3. We’ll bear up I’m sure. I think this is one example where Brown can just about get away with his ‘the country’/ ‘the nation’ rhetoric.

    Comment by Hendre — 25 August 2009 @ 2.45 pm | Reply

  4. Ooh, Hendre – you dear little person! lol!!

    Comment by Maria — 25 August 2009 @ 3.44 pm | Reply

  5. What makes you think the one eyed son of the manse wrote that letter, more than likely he got a English bag carrier who loves cricket to do it for him I for one believes he would choke on the word England, I have only ever heard him say the regions of Britain

    Comment by Dave — 25 August 2009 @ 6.53 pm | Reply

  6. Isn’t the England cricket team one of those words situations where the term England is used to mean Britain, where Britain is greater England? A number of Welsh players have played for England in the past, and I believe that Scots and NI cricketers deemed good enough would also be entitled to play for England too.

    Comment by Alwyn ap Huw — 25 August 2009 @ 7.38 pm | Reply

  7. No it aint. Now -uck off Alwyn, theres a good chap.

    Comment by Jon — 25 August 2009 @ 11.22 pm | Reply

  8. This is what wiki has to say:

    “ECB regulations state that to play for England, a player must be a British or Irish citizen, and have either been born in England or Wales, or have lived in England or Wales for the last four years. This has led to players of many other nationalities becoming eligible to play for England. England have been captained by a Scot, Mike Denness, and four South Africans, Tony Greig, Allan Lamb, Andrew Strauss and Kevin Pietersen. South African Cape Coloured player Basil D’Oliveira, famously played for England during the Apartheid era.”

    Presumably Mike Denness qualified under residency rules as he played in the County Championship. I take it this was also Geraint Jones’s route to eligibility as cricket doesn’t appear to have a ‘granny’ rule.

    Comment by Hendre — 26 August 2009 @ 10.51 am | Reply

    • An appropriately abstruse cricket-type definition of nationality! It’s a bit like the nationality version of that funny cricket rule, whose name I forget, for determining the result of a one-day match that’s rained off before the second innings is over!

      Comment by David — 26 August 2009 @ 12.37 pm | Reply

  9. “England have been captained by a Scot, Mike Denness, and four South Africans, Tony Greig, Allan Lamb, Andrew Strauss and Kevin Pietersen.”

    Oh you forgot to mention that some of the “south african” players have ENGLISH parents. Well, I am not surprised about that considering your hidden agenda.
    What about Simon Easterby? He is English but plays for the rep of ireland (rugby)
    Five players play for Scotland -they were not born in Scotland, e.g. Ryan Watson was born in Zimbabwe. Ed Joyce played cricket for Ireland and England.

    Shaun Edwards the Englishman was appointed as a coach of wales. Why aren’t you objecting to that?

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-523709/We-Englishman-thank-helping-Wales-set-sights-Grand-Slam.html#ixzz0PPScZvZm

    Comment by MAnderson — 27 August 2009 @ 6.16 pm | Reply

  10. MAnderson, you think wikipedia has a hidden agenda?

    Comment by Hendre — 28 August 2009 @ 10.21 am | Reply

  11. MAnderson: The Irish rugby team (like their cricket team) represents both Northern Ireland and the Republic.

    Comment by Dudkey — 30 August 2009 @ 3.37 pm | Reply

  12. Gosh, so he actually came out and said it. never knew. Well spotted.

    Comment by jameshigham — 8 October 2009 @ 3.59 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: